Monday, February 23, 2009

Extortion

There are various definitions of extortion, and it easy to find many on the web.  One that is relevant today defines extortion as, "using threats or other coercive means to obtain money from others."

Isn't this what is going on with the Investment Class and their minions on The Street and in the Media right now?  Each time the Federal government sidles towards what needs to happen -- the FDIC shuts down the mismanaged banks and forces write-downs, policy, and management changes, for instance -- there is a great hue and cry among the Minions.  The major indices lose a few hundred points of value.  The Feds back off... or divert more cash into the coffers of the wealthiest of the wealthy through TARP funds or some other flawed vehicle... or both.

If it feels like / looks like / smells like extortion, then it probably is extortion.

What needs to happen?

Civil suits.  Lots of them.  All of the VP and above employees of ALL of the big financial institutions need to be slapped with major, ruinous civil lawsuits.  The purpose of these suits needs to be punitive and harsh.  The lawsuits must turn these spoiled princes into paupers and redistribute their wealth to individual investors.

The spoils should be divided by going to those investors with the smallest net worth as measured by their portfolio value (in absolute dollars), their real estate holdings, their cash and savings, and their gross income over the past five years.

The government cannot do this.  The top tenth of a percent is simply too powerful. But individual attorneys can and should take up this cause. There should be a torrent of lawsuits that make the mild shareholder "rebellions" of the 1990's look like a spring shower.

Just a thought for a rainy afternoon here at the edge of the continent.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Visiting Abroad

The Old Amigo was pleased to hear this evening that President Obama (those two words still bring a smile, don't they?) visited Ottawa today and that a planned 10 minute, private chat with Prime Minister Harper was extended to 30 minutes because the two men hit it off well.  President Obama says that he is looking for appropriate ways to enhance trade with our good and very important northern neighbor. Prime Minister Harper says that he recognizes and takes seriously our security concerns. The leaders issue a joint statement to the effect that they want to pursue clean energy development in North America.

Then the radio reported that Secretary Clinton did on-the-street outreach in Indonesia during her asian trip. Her trip began in Japan, where she demonstrated by her presence the importance of our relations with that country and where she visited university students. She visits leaders. She visits young people on a music program.  She is now in South Korea where she is touring a major women's college. There were excerpts from some speeches. The excerpts portrayed Secretary C in a good light. She spoke earnestly yet gently of her boss and his ideas.

Something about these stories lends grounds for optimism. Perhaps it is the respect that these two important leaders demonstrate to their counterparts. Perhaps it is the new-found enthusiasm and happiness with which they are greeted by their hosts and by the citizens of the host countries. Perhaps it is their obvious intelligence and desire to make things better. It may merely be that they realize that they represent our country and are clearly trying to make a good impression.

What a concept.
  

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Oil Prices as a Limit to Growth

Our media -- the great Dispensers of Amnesia -- would have us believe that the so-called real estate meltdown lies at the root of our current economic troubles.

Never mind the trillions of dollars of wealth that the Criminals of Wall Street slurped, sucked, and bled from the economy.

Never mind the bloated, ravenous swine at the top of the Corporate Pyramid Scheme who chuckle with malignant glee as they destroy the careers of working people and solemnly pronounce that "the American Worker is over-compensated when we consider the needs of the Global Marketplace."

Never mind the price of oil.

What? Oil has fallen from -- what was it? The neighborhood of $150/barrel? -- to below $40 per barrel. How can it be that its price limits economic growth, let alone is able to trigger an economic contraction?

Here's the deal: Of the major oil producers, only the Saudis have any real headroom for production. Mexico's fields show signs of a rapid decline into exhaustion. Venezuela has infrastructure problems. The same is true of Nigeria. Canada's oil is tied up in expensive, hard-to-extract tar sands. Russia's new-found, oil-backed chest-puffing will soon deflate. The list goes on. Maybe our good friends in Iran & Iraq have some headroom. Yeah. That's it: Iran will do everything it can to help our economy.

The economies of India and China continue to need unprecedented amounts of energy. Their citizens have exactly the same rights as everyone else on our planet to the pursuit of happiness, and they are in fast pursuit. They will buy as much oil as they can, and without changes in their growth strategies, they will drive oil demand.

Oil prices have softened largely because the US economy has softened. We hit a bunch of economic "soft patches" (remember that term?) and our economy turned south. Sadly, we seem to be on the verge of forgetting that against the backdrop of all the other economic events, oil import costs matched and then surpassed the percent of GDP that we saw in aftermath of the 1973 oil embargo.

When oil price reaches a certain threshold value, it acts as a brake on the economy. It makes the transportation of goods more expensive. It makes what little manufacturing that we still do less profitable. It causes us to spend more to heat and power our homes. For those of us who are employed, increased oil prices result in increased commute costs. 

When we spend more for energy, we cut down on our discretionary spending. Since so-called "consumer spending" accounts for approximately 66% of our GDP, a significant drop in that spending has a big effect on the overall economy.

If our economy has already been weakened, high oil prices can trigger a situation in which we spin into a recession. Eventually, the economic slow-down results in a temporary softening of oil prices, but as the recession bottoms out, our need for energy will firm up and then drive the price of oil as our economy expands.  

The price will rise until it reaches a level that impedes economic activity. Then we are again susceptible to an economic contraction.

The Amigo thinks that there is a way off this treadmill. 

Energy conservation and (real) renewable energy generation provide this way. Note the term "real" in the preceding sentence.
 
Most bio-fuels are little more than a re-direction of our tax dollars into the maw of agribusiness. Maybe tropical regions -- Brazil comes to mind -- could sustainably grow sugar cane or sugar beets and process that crop into alcohol, but we're not going to see that happen with corn from Nebraska. The sugar content of the crop just isn't high enough.  

Maybe oil-producing algae will let us produce bio-diesel. The Amigo doesn't know enough about that to make a call.  Some skepticism is warranted.

Nuclear energy has, over its checkered history, received orders of magnitude more government subsidy than all forms of renewable energy put together. In fact, the investment equation is so out of balance that nuclear has gotten more federal tax dollars in the last decade than the cumulative federal investment in all forms of renewable energy.

And don't let anyone tell you that nuclear energy is clean and renewable. Have you ever heard of a thing called a uranium mine? Mine tailings from said uranium mine? Nuclear fuel refining? Transportation and sequestration of nuclear waste? The notion that nuclear energy is anything more than another boondoggle whereby tax dollars better spent elsewhere are instead channeled into the coffers of a few big corporations is the shallowest of lies.

But there is so much that we can do. Here is a list. It's not a trivialized "10 Things You Can Do to Save the Earth" list. Rather, it outlines a scalable strategy that can be applied locally, regionally, and nationally:
  • Wind, Sun, and Tidal Flow all have promise. Perhaps you have the financial and location-related resources to adopt one or more of these. Domestic solar hot water in particular represents a modest investment with a reasonable payback in many locales. At least educate yourself on what makes sense in your region.
  • Ultra efficient buildings and vehicles are absolutely necessary. You can start with wherever you live and make incremental changes to improve its efficiency, enhance comfort, and reduce your monthly utility bills.
  • Residential scale rain catchment can reduce runoff, erosion, groundwater pollution, and waste. You can start with as little as a simple rain barrel hooked to a downspout and grow your system. If you have the resources you can build a large system that can offset a significant fraction of your water needs.
  • Local production of goods and services hold promise for living wage jobs. This grows slowly and only with concerted effort among people living in an area. Zoning changes can facilitate mixed use and this in turn can help convert unlivable housing developments into real communities.
  • Walkable towns and neighborhoods enhance our health and our sense of place. What lies within a 10 minute walk from your door? Do you even know? If there is something of value within a 10 minute radius, then nurture it. Encourage your neighbors to do the same.
  • "Victory Gardens" during World War II eased shortages and provided healthy food to millions. What really stops you from growing a few vegetables for yourself or your neighbors?
  • The free-flow of information and high performance computing both provide opportunities for growth -- especially if we can deploy the waste heat from those compute farms to good use.
  • Recycling at the regional level can reduce energy needs, reduce the need for extractive industries, and reduce transportation costs. Recent developments are beginning to allow single-stream recycling. This means that you won't need to sort your recyclables into so many categories. It also means that more items can be recycled economically. 
  • Don't forget reuse. This is an especially efficient of recycling action. Used clothing stores often provide high quality goods at reasonable prices. Surplus and salvaged building supplies can be adapted to new uses. 
All of these factors can have a positive impact on our quality of life. Many of these actions can be undertaken as individuals or via informal neighborhood arrangements. Each time the Amigo looks at the list, more points get added. You could add a few points of your own and customize your actions to your economic situation and your locale.

Until we wean ourselves off oil as a fuel, we will continue to bump our heads against the price of oil every time our economy digs its way out of recession and begins significant expansion. The best way to enable this change is to be conscious of what you buy and who you buy it from. If you live somewhere that enjoys an uncorrupt local government, you can also try to influence local policy towards sustainable choices. Talk to your neighbors. You will probably find some at least who feel the way you do and will want to share knowledge, expertise, and labor. Such interactions build communities and require neither wealth or legislation.

Remember: limited power is not the same thing as being powerless. Each of us can do a little. Together, well...

Friday, February 13, 2009

Recipe Report

It turns out that fudge seems to need sugar.  Something about crystalizing, hardening the concoction.  The Amigo's peanut-butter & honey fudge-like compound tastes pretty darn good, but it has the consistency of really chewy taffy.  It takes a jack-hammer to pry a hunk of it out of the casserole dish in the fridge.

PackardMan Smith provided the Venerable Friendly One with some ideas about further fudge iterations, but we're going to have to simmer the fudge mixture for well over an hour, beat it for a lot longer -- perhaps for 15 minutes -- and/or substitute regular old sugar for at least half of the honey.

Stay tuned.  At least it tastes good.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

A Memory


George T. was an interesting guy. He was a Lebanese immigrant and spoke heavily accented English. As a very small child, he survived a massacre of most of the males in his village only because his mother had the presence of mind to hide him beneath her skirts.

As is the case in so many immigrant stories, George came to America and worked extremely hard as a young man. He labored and he picked cotton.  Later, he owned a store in Oklahoma. He could lift and carry a heavy sack of grain in each hand.  Even late in life (he lived into his 90's) if you bought George a watch band, you had to buy two because it took one-and-a-half watch bands to wrap around his wrist. And his wrists had no fat on them. 

Working and saving, George and his wife, Martha, put three of their sons through medical school.  Their oldest child, a daughter, became a very successful business woman.  Such were the times and the people.

Many, many years later, George and one of his adult sons were traveling -- in Texas I think. George got to hanging out with an older Mexican guy and told his son, "You go on home. I'm going to go with these guys to their ranch down in Mexico." 

Now recall: George's English wasn't so good. His Spanish was extremely limited. His son said something like, "Are you sure you want to do that, Dad? You don't know anything about these people." 

George replied to the effect, "Son, if you're a good enough person, you don't have to worry about other people. I'll be back in a week.  Meet me here." 

So, George got into his new friends' truck and went off and a great time. He ate lots of home-cooked Mexican food.  He helped care for the goats.  He rode a donkey around the ranch. He returned just when and where he said he would.

Yes, this was a long time ago, and we all regret that the world has gotten nastier in too many ways. 

Still, it is a good memory.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Decisions, Decisions... and Recipes

Well, the Amigo has version 0.8 of his Nailtini inventory and order tracking program up and running. Quite a few features.  Not very many known bugs.  Certainly ready for the clients to try it out and provide feedback.  Angel is one such client, and she is already giving me input on how to make the program more useful.

This seems like a good time to study some more programming technology.  The Nailtini program uses: PHP, MySQL, html, css, and a little JavaScript.  It's been a fun experience and a great learning experience.  The question is: what's the next thing to learn?  What would give me the best ROI?  

I spent a few hours reading up on Java.  Not JavaScript, but Java.  The Amigo had an interview a while back w/ a manager at Amazon.com.  The developers there -- or at least those in that manager's group -- use Java under Linux.  Some of the best programmers (and smartest guys) I've ever met have been Java programmers.

OTOH, there's Python.  It's much more modern than Java, but it's not falling-off-the-leading-edge-modern.  Python's momentum is definitely on the upswing.  It's certainly easier to learn than Java.

Finally, I found a pretty nice website devoted to Python.  The author of that site recommends that if you want to be a Python programmer, you should also know (you guessed it): PHP, MySQL (or equivalent), html, css, and JavaScript.  Well, shucks.

Do any of you -- Subscribers to the Wrong Rock -- have suggestions?  Do any of you think it would be a Bad Idea or a Waste of Time to focus on Python learning for a few weeks?

The other thing that's going on today is an attempt at creating a recipe.  This is the 2nd try.  The Venerable Friendly One would like to have a reliable recipe for dark chocolate fudge that's made with honey (instead of white sugar) and with some combination of peanut butter and almond butter (instead of dairy butter).  

The first iteration resulted in scorched chocolate sauce.  Since it was chocolate, it was still good (sort of).  The recipe from which I started indicated that you shouldn't stir the fudge after it started to boil and that you should use a candy thermometer.  Thus, the mixture scorched before ever reaching the "soft ball stage".  

At about 50 minutes of simmering, with occasional stirring to prevent stickage, the fudge mixture was clearly at the "thread stage".  Barring other data, it shall be declared Cooked at approximately one hour of simmering.

This time, the Amigo will use an electric mixer to beat the fudge into submission. Hopefully that will address the lack of thickenage.

Stay tuned on this one.